Welcome to my home page. I live in New York, NY and Oak Bluffs, MA;
I'm married to Julie; I'm dad to Hazel. I work as a programmer; I have a
dog, and she has a web site too.
This is pretty interesting reading from Paul Werbos; gives an excellent high-level overview of what we're facing:
http://www.werbos.com/energy.htm
Werbos has some good slides
about the near-term future of electric cars. The battery stuff is
interesting, he points out that the new Lithium Iron Phosphate
(LiFePO4) batteries appear to be a major breakthrough. LiFePO4 has
some great qualities:
long cycle life (~2000 cycles)
safe/stable (they don't burn or explode if abused)
high current capability (good for vehicles; you can draw a lot of power quickly to accelerate)
relatively fast initial charging
made of non-scarce non-expensive materials
The only real technical downside that I know of is that they have
lower energy/volume density than some other Lithium technologies.
Their energy/mass density seems to be on a par with conventional
Lithium-Ion but since they weight less for a given volume, you need a
physically larger battery for the same energy content. But it's not a
major problem; they're still very good batteries.
It looks as though these batteries will be good enough and cheap
enough to make electric and plugin hybrid cars truly mainstream within
the next few years!
Why I'm Against Nuclear Power
A few otherwise-rational-seeming techies loudly promote nuclear power
as a way out of our oil/climate/etc energy problems. They cite some
impressive facts, like its relatively low cost, proven technology, the
fact that coal-burning plants release more radiation than properly
operating nuke plants (due to the trace uranium in coal going into the
atmosphere), and that nuke power plants use a much lower grade of fuel
than weapons.
But, because I actually read the news, I know they are wrong. We
should not be promoting nuclear power. The two basic problems:
Broken ceiling fan? Like to fix stuff? In my case I needed a particular Rhine remote receiver. Rhine is a Taiwan company that
makes ceiling fan remotes/receivers/motor controllers and only sells
to OEMs. The normal dealers mostly don't list individual parts.
Fortunately, these guys
are specifically set up for solving the problem, they have all the
spare parts, you just call them up and read off the exact model
number: http://www.eceilingfans.com/order.html
BTW we've been pretty happy with the
Minka
Aire Concept II, except for that one broken remote receiver.
Jersey Beat
turned me on to a band called
Lemuria, from Buffalo NY. I heard
a couple songs on myspace and ordered their album "Get Better". I've
been listening to it a lot. It's wicked awesome, a little bit like
Jawbreaker meets Team Dresch. Not as frenetic as that would be, but
still hits my spot.
I also stopped by Home Depot. Their stuff definitely fits within my
budget, but none of it looked good to me (let alone, Mrs. Thatch).
I figured I would be back online looking at stuff. My last stop
before giving up was a store right around the corner from my
apartment: Lightforms. For some
reason I was biased against them -- I guess I have an inherent disdain
for the general concept of a lighting store, since I have never needed
one before, and resented the fact that they consumed an entire retail
storefront near my apartment.
Anyway, I walked in, gawked at the ceiling for a few minutes, and
suddenly saw something I actually liked! And it was on the cheap end
of the range! The saleslady was very helpful and turned me on to the
square version of the round fixture that was on display, and had some
advice on sizing etc. For the record, I ended up with the
Tiella
90 at around $90 each.
Score one for bricks & mortar. That said, I want to jot down some of
the semi-decent online contemporary lighting stores, for future
reference:
1. Hillary & McCain are falling over themselves to say it shows that
Obama is an elitist. Really? The two filthy-rich candidates,
whose campaigns have literally been run by Washington corporate
lobbyists, think the other guy is an elitist. The half-black dude
from Hawaii, raised by a single mom, who spent his time prior to
politics organizing job training programs, and didn't finish paying
off his student loans until after the age of 40. That guy's an
elitist.
2. Are any of these looked-down-upon voters actually offended? I'm
sure some patch of
astroturf will
complain loudly, but to me, it's pretty cool that a candidate
actually wants to confront the causes of people's bitterness,
instead of distracting them with a bunch of bull, as per usual.
3. Is anybody else appalled that Hillary's taking up the Republican
talking point here? McCain I understand, it's still totally
ridiculous, but expected. But Hillary? Sheesh.
Anyway, unlike the Wright hoo-hah, this one seems like it could be a
political net win for Obama once people are done processing it.
Here's Obama's spin on it:
(* No, I don't really wear birkenstocks or sip lattes, and
I've been known to bowl.)
What does MP3 compression sound like? Kind of a stupid question
considering that many of us listen to it all the time. But it does
have an answer, sort of.
While I was uploading Sinkhole, I tried an experiment. I compressed
the albums at 256kbps which, for me, is basically indistinguishable
from the original. I took one song's mp3 and loaded it into Audacity
(a nice free audio editor). I took the same song's original .wav file
and loaded it into a second track in Audacity, parallel to the first.
Then I inverted one of the tracks (i.e. reversed the polarity). Then
I zoomed way in so I could see individual samples, and found an
obvious peak in the audio (a bass drum hit). I slid one of the tracks
slightly in time so that the extreme value of the peak was at the
exactly same time in both tracks.
Then I played both tracks together. If MP3 were lossless, in theory I
would hear nothing -- the two sounds should perfectly cancel each
other out, leaving silence.
In practice, MP3 is lossy, and so I heard "what MP3 sounds like".
Huh? Yes -- you can think of an MP3 as just the original signal with
some junk added. I was listening to the junk.
In other words:
Let A = original audio signal
mp3(x) is the signal x compressed and the decompressed by mp3.
So:
mp3(A) = A + someJunk (MP3 is just regular audio with some junk added)
someJunk = mp3(A) - A (I isolated the junk)
it contains a snippet of the original so you can hear what it sounds
like, followed by someJunk.
To me, it sounds like music blasting extremely loud, and I'm next to
some newspaper wrapped around a coffee can full of old screws and
nails. The newspaper and stuff rattle in time to the music, but the
music is so loud I can't hear the rattling at all unless the music
stops suddenly.
OR
Think of MP3 as the original signal with some stuff subtracted. The
stuff that's left out is -someJunk.
My old band, Sinkhole, just
released two of our albums under the Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 license. This pretty much means you can do
whatever you want with them, including use songs as background for
your intermediate falconry tips video, but more to the point, download
and listen to.
These two albums are the ones on Ringing Ear
Records, the label that we (mostly Jon) ran. We also released two
albums on Doctor Strange Records.
We're checking with the Doc to see how he feels about us putting those
online also. No promises.